Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New articles
New media comments
New article comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
New showcase items
New showcase comments
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Reviews
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Search showcase
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search engine:
Threadloom Search
XenForo Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Raising BackYard Chickens
Feeding & Watering Your Flock
Debate on food, free range and egg quality...
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="U_Stormcrow" data-source="post: 25955111" data-attributes="member: 577589"><p>Last comment, I'm stepping off. It's raining again, I've lost satellite internet again, and power three times in the last 20 minutes.</p><p></p><p>I've used USDA before, either because I'm responding to someone using it, or because it has a common data set of ingredients not found on Wikipedia. I have three complaints.</p><p></p><p>Usda sample sets are often smaller, particularly for the more common ingredients, and frequently include either calculated or "common" values between similar ingredients. Two, it's almost all "food grade", which sometime means enriched ingredients, and sometime captures ingredients of higher nutritional value than what is used for animal feeds, and third (which is minor, but significant to me), the way it's database loads, it's very data intensive. When ones internet is a data limited 1-2 bar cell phone connection, it's slow and wasteful of my connection. Oh, and it doesn't offer sources.</p><p></p><p>I'll look at your UK source, I've not poked around.</p><p></p><p>I know I've looked at feedtables in the past, but have no specific memory, so let's pretend I haven't. I'll look again.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="U_Stormcrow, post: 25955111, member: 577589"] Last comment, I'm stepping off. It's raining again, I've lost satellite internet again, and power three times in the last 20 minutes. I've used USDA before, either because I'm responding to someone using it, or because it has a common data set of ingredients not found on Wikipedia. I have three complaints. Usda sample sets are often smaller, particularly for the more common ingredients, and frequently include either calculated or "common" values between similar ingredients. Two, it's almost all "food grade", which sometime means enriched ingredients, and sometime captures ingredients of higher nutritional value than what is used for animal feeds, and third (which is minor, but significant to me), the way it's database loads, it's very data intensive. When ones internet is a data limited 1-2 bar cell phone connection, it's slow and wasteful of my connection. Oh, and it doesn't offer sources. I'll look at your UK source, I've not poked around. I know I've looked at feedtables in the past, but have no specific memory, so let's pretend I haven't. I'll look again. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Raising BackYard Chickens
Feeding & Watering Your Flock
Debate on food, free range and egg quality...
Top
Bottom